The Democrats
have claimed there were around 30 million people without insurance
coverage (note that does not mean health care, just insurance coverage;
that argument remains for another time). So they went about remaking the
entire health insurance and health care industry. This has resulted in
BILLIONS of dollars in cost to taxpayers and the insured alike.
But would it not have been simpler and cheaper for the government to
simply indemnify - cover - the health care for those 30 million, say,
even to the tune of $2M per? That caps the cost at around 60 million.
And the insured definitely could have kept your plan, period.
There was so much more afoot with the Democrats; there always is.
What did the GOP say? They think government should be out of it entirely. Sounds good to me!
Republicans seek own policy cure to replace Obamacare - Yahoo News
Friday, January 24, 2014
Obamacare and the Freedoms
Free assembly means you have the right to choose your associations, be they personal or business. The Obama government is forcing you to make an association, one with an insurance company which you may not want, which in my view is clearly unconstitutional. Unless you're a lefty.
If you agree with me, feel free to forward this. I think maybe we need to show the lawyers - who seem immersed in the minutiae of law - how to get back our freedoms.
Wednesday, January 22, 2014
Stoners-R-Us
Family-owned Colo. marijuana shop wants to become 'Costco of weed' - Yahoo News
Sick of this. I say, let people buy it without restriction. But you have to sign a waiver on purchase that says you will no longer be eligible for any government benefits, such as welfare nor unemployment, nor will you be able to sue your employer when they require urine checks of all employees. Therefore, you truly "tune out" at your own risk. Consequences.
Isn't it lovely that liberals always want to do social experiments with other people's lives? we know what Marijuana does. But eff it, have at it, stoners.
Sick of this. I say, let people buy it without restriction. But you have to sign a waiver on purchase that says you will no longer be eligible for any government benefits, such as welfare nor unemployment, nor will you be able to sue your employer when they require urine checks of all employees. Therefore, you truly "tune out" at your own risk. Consequences.
Isn't it lovely that liberals always want to do social experiments with other people's lives? we know what Marijuana does. But eff it, have at it, stoners.
Tuesday, January 21, 2014
Monday, January 20, 2014
'I’ve got a pen': Obama raises hackles with executive actions
'I’ve got a pen': Obama raises hackles with executive actions
I think Pres O is going to keep me in material to write about for some time. I've been railing on his inability to act as an American, president or otherwise, and here is just more proof: He either does not understand, or ignores, the roles of government bodies and whole notion of the separation of powers. O is often referred to as "king," and the hits just keep on coming.
I think Pres O is going to keep me in material to write about for some time. I've been railing on his inability to act as an American, president or otherwise, and here is just more proof: He either does not understand, or ignores, the roles of government bodies and whole notion of the separation of powers. O is often referred to as "king," and the hits just keep on coming.
Obama: Marijuana no more dangerous than alcohol | Fox News
Ok, here's another take on this: if Obama was - just for the sake of argument - a Chinese mole, or maybe just a traitor, would he not encourage the use of drugs that would impair the productivity of the American worker? That in turn leads to the collapse of the US economy, which then allows external forces - for the sake of argument, the Chinese - to take over the US political system with out firing a shot. Hmmm...?
Obama: Marijuana no more dangerous than alcohol | Fox News
Obama: Marijuana no more dangerous than alcohol | Fox News
Sunday, January 19, 2014
What is President O?
Serendipity: I was just saying the other day about Obama, that he is not a true American. He isn't an American patriot; he just doesn't behave like an American. Americans believe in freedom and the rights of the individual, and despite Obama's claims of being a US Constitutional professor (adjunct instructor of a single course is more like it) , his policies and actions are so far removed from anything that is historically "American" as to be head-scratching.
This all makes sense when one puts together that Pres O, despite being born within the US, was raised outside of these shores. Further, he sought out and made associations with people who were far outside the American norm. Bill Ayers (who for the life of me I cannot figure out why is not behind bars for attempted murder in the Weather Underground bombings), and Jeremiah "God Damn America" Wright. It shows. He behaves like, at best, a foreigner, and at worst, a traitor. If you've ever been overseas, you know what I mean; foreigners just don't understand us. Their experiences are all about dealing with the government on an intimate level, and this includes the so-called more "enlightened" governments of western Europe. Americans want as little to do with government as possible.
If one takes a broad view of Obama's policies rather than looking at them piecemeal, one can surmise that he's trying to undermine the American Way, and he's doing it in the manner that clever Asians would do. Which makes sense, since he was raised in Asia. He's undermining the American economy using the economy itself to do it - kind of an economic jiu-jitsu, where the power of one is used against him. How best to kill an economic system based on credit and trust than to trust an enemy with your own insurmountable debt?
I'm not sure how to sum this all up. I usually like to offer a solution at this point, but the only one I can think of is to remove O from office. But whoever thinks that will happen is buying swampland in Florida as we speak. Feel free to offer suggestions of a non-violent nature. But it's clear we need some form of revolution. More on that in a later installment...
Edward Said: The ‘Founding Father’ Who May Explain Obama’s Benghazi Errors | Video | TheBlaze.com
This all makes sense when one puts together that Pres O, despite being born within the US, was raised outside of these shores. Further, he sought out and made associations with people who were far outside the American norm. Bill Ayers (who for the life of me I cannot figure out why is not behind bars for attempted murder in the Weather Underground bombings), and Jeremiah "God Damn America" Wright. It shows. He behaves like, at best, a foreigner, and at worst, a traitor. If you've ever been overseas, you know what I mean; foreigners just don't understand us. Their experiences are all about dealing with the government on an intimate level, and this includes the so-called more "enlightened" governments of western Europe. Americans want as little to do with government as possible.
If one takes a broad view of Obama's policies rather than looking at them piecemeal, one can surmise that he's trying to undermine the American Way, and he's doing it in the manner that clever Asians would do. Which makes sense, since he was raised in Asia. He's undermining the American economy using the economy itself to do it - kind of an economic jiu-jitsu, where the power of one is used against him. How best to kill an economic system based on credit and trust than to trust an enemy with your own insurmountable debt?
I'm not sure how to sum this all up. I usually like to offer a solution at this point, but the only one I can think of is to remove O from office. But whoever thinks that will happen is buying swampland in Florida as we speak. Feel free to offer suggestions of a non-violent nature. But it's clear we need some form of revolution. More on that in a later installment...
Edward Said: The ‘Founding Father’ Who May Explain Obama’s Benghazi Errors | Video | TheBlaze.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)